[Ecrit] Re: comments on I-D Mapping Arch

[Henning Schulzrinne <hgs at cs.columbia.edu>]

Murugaraj Shanmugam wrote:
>  Hi henning,
>
> I went through the draft and it is in a good shape. Here are my comments:


Thanks for your comments.

> * The draft extensively uses civic location look up as an example, 
> however it will be helpful for the reader to know how Geo look up will 
> work based on the architecture. I knew the discussion that the mechanism 
> is the same for both civic and geo look up but, as/for a reader, some 
> information about geo is missing.

Can you be a bit more specific about the information you'd like to have? 
This will help us address this concern, as we prepare the next version.


> * For some reasons, if the seeker gets the wrong PSAP information (or 
> not reachable), what the seeker shall do? Does this issue is relevant 
> for the architecture? For example, recommendtions to contact default PSAP?,

This seems to be a topic for the BCP, as it is outside the scope of the 
mapping architecture and LoST. It may also depend on the service; for 
example, a pizza service is unlikely to have a default mapping ("if all 
else fails, get cheese pizza from Domino's.")



> * IMHO, the structure of the document may be reformatted, for example 
> section 4 gives the overview of the operation and then section 5,6,8 
> also provides some repetitve information. It would be good to combine 
> those sections acordingly. Then it can explain the basic operation of 
> the mapping architcure.
>
> For example:
> Section 4: Overview of the components/entities (Trees, FGs, Resolvers, 
> Seeker)
> Section 5: Basic Operation (Architecture, operation, answering queries, 
> scalability...)

I will try to streamline the document, along the lines you suggest.


>  
> ciao,
> Raj.
>  

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit