Re: [Ecrit] [Fwd: Re: [Uri-review] IETF ECRIT Working Group: LoST URI Scheme --- Review Needed]

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

Hi Andy,

Andrew Newton wrote:
> On Feb 1, 2007, at 9:17 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
> > I think that the criteria is not whether it will be typed in. The 
> > AAA/AAAS URI scheme for Diameter is not typed in  --- in fact it is 
> > used in the very same way as we use it here.
>
> Fine.  URIs can also be used as protocol elements.  What other 
> protocols need to pass around LoST URIs in a generic URI protocol field?
Currently, we are focusing on the emergency services use case and there 
I haven't seen a place where we have to use the LoST URIs in other 
protocols.

Btw, the mentioned AAA/AAAS URIs are not used in other protocols either.

If I understood you right then you would like to use a 'host' as is 
defined in Section 3.2.2 of RFC 3986 with the lost URI scheme.

Ciao
Hannes
> -andy


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit