[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ecrit] LoST civic caching issue



Hi Henning,

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:

On Apr 14, 2007, at 12:41 PM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:

Hi Henning,

thanks for raising this issue and it is in fact a difficult problem.

I see two aspects with the "the donut problem", i.e., there is a larger service boundary with another service area within (the hole in the donut). There are two cases:

* The entity responsible for the larger service area knows that there is a donut problem. In this case it would be reasonable to assume that this entity could mark the response as "non cachable". For geo one would want to express the service area as a donut -- currently we don't have a description how to describe such a shape. I now believe that we should add something to the PIDF-LO profile draft.

Polygons can be used to describe structures with holes - you just have to have the polygon 'wrap around' the hole and overlap in the middle. It gets tedious for multiple holes.


Also, it appears that common SQL databases with geo extensions, such as the popular PostGIS, do not support such complicated shapes. Thus, it may be a better idea to compose this, as a set of coverage polygons [we got that] and a set of exceptions.



This is indeed an alternative. I wonder how long it takes to "standardize" it.
We should probably consult with Carl about this aspect.




* The entity responsible for the larger service area does NOT know about a potential donut problem. This case is actually not related to civic since it can appear in geo as well. I don't have an easy and nice answer for this case.

That is indeed the hard case. However, I believe it is properly the responsibility of the exception case to notify the surrounding entity that it wants to be considered a 'hole'. My perception is that institutions, such as university campuses, with their own police force or ambulance corps coordinate with the local civic authorities, rather than just freelance. I don't know the politics or legalities of whether, say, the NYPD would allow the Columbia police force to be declared officially in charge. If all else fails, the local LoST resolver would have to implement local policy. This is similar to what happens today: If you dial 911 on a cell phone while on the Columbia campus, you'll be connected to the NYPD, not campus police.


I think we have to spell-out this case clearly in the document.

Henning


Ciao
Hannes


_______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit