Re: [Ecrit] LoST civic caching issue

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

OK. There are certainly different ways to come to the same result.
We could obviously create a structure, like
> [enclosing polygon/civic without hole]
> <except>
>   [exception 1 (geo or civic)]
> </except>
> <except>
>   [exception 2 (geo or civic)]
> </except>
> ...
in LoST itself.

Maybe this is just the simplest approach to pick.

Ciao
Hannes


Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> > This is indeed an alternative. I wonder how long it takes to 
> > "standardize" it.
> > We should probably consult with Carl about this aspect.
>
> This is strictly a LoST syntax issue and just uses existing GML 
> polygons. Thus, we don't have to wait for or depend on OGC, the 
> pdif-lo draft or anything else.
>
> Henning


_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit