Hi Qian, thanks for the document. Interesting usage of LoST. A few quick comments:* I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to define some new service URNs for the usage of these "unsafe" areas instead of adding a new attribute. The reason for this is that the existing service URNs are somewhat difficult to use in this context. For example, what does it mean to have the unsafe attribute included in the request when the "urn:service:sos.poison" URN is used? New URNs are being proposed, such as those in http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification-00.txt, that make the semantic even more difficult to interpret.
* Would be useful to include an element in the reponse to point to more detailed information, such as a URL to a webpage?
* Deployment: Who do you think would want to run such a service? Would this be something the PSAP operator would want todo? Tourism office? Police departments? (I am trying to figure out where to get some feedback from.)
How often do you think the "service boundaries" of these unsafe areas change? (Keep constant for years vs. change every day)
Ciao Hannes Qian Sun wrote:
Hi, All I just submitted a new draft, it can be found here:http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00.txtFilename: draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas Revision: 00 Title: Specifying Unsafe Areas in LoST Service Boundary Creation_date: 2008-07-01 WG ID: Independent Submission Number_of_pages: 8 Abstract: This document describes how to specify unsafe areas in LoST for emergency services, such as police, mountain, marine and fire. Your comments are welcome! Thanks! Qian _______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
_______________________________________________ Ecrit mailing list Ecrit at ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit