Re: [Ecrit] Comments for draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00

[Qian Sun <sunqian at huawei.com>]

Thanks for comments!

In another draft we use this way you suggested to find safe areas:
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sun-ecrit-shelter-service-00

Regards,
Qian
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl Heinz Wolf [mailto:khwolf1 at gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:20 PM
> To: Hannes Tschofenig
> Cc: Qian Sun; ecrit at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Comments for draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I also read the draft, and like Hannes, my first thought was about a
> separate service URN for this propose.
> 
> One additional comment:
> When the unsafe-Information is included to the Mapping Information of
> a particular PSAP, there could be a problem when a PSAP is responsible
> for a large area. Assuming a police PSAP is responsible for a whole
> federal state, there may be hundreds of unsafe areas inside - and most
> of them will be far away from my current location. So it could be more
> interesting to query for all unsafe-areas within a radius of 5 km,
> regardless of the service boundary of a particular PSAP.
> 
> cheers
> karl heinz
> 
> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Hannes Tschofenig
> <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net> wrote:
> > Hi Qian,
> >
> > thanks for the document. Interesting usage of LoST.
> >
> > A few quick comments:
> >
> > * I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to define some new service URNs for
> > the usage of these "unsafe" areas instead of adding a new attribute.
> > The reason for this is that the existing service URNs are somewhat difficult
> > to use in this context. For example, what does it mean to have the unsafe
> > attribute included in the request when the "urn:service:sos.poison" URN is
> > used? New URNs are being proposed, such as those in
> >
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification-00.txt,
> > that make the semantic even more difficult to interpret.
> >
> > * Would be useful to include an element in the reponse to point to more
> > detailed information, such as a URL to a webpage?
> >
> > * Deployment: Who do you think would want to run such a service? Would this
> > be something the PSAP operator would want todo? Tourism office? Police
> > departments? (I am trying to figure out where to get some feedback from.)
> >
> > How often do you think the "service boundaries" of these unsafe areas
> > change? (Keep constant for years vs. change every day)
> >
> > Ciao
> > Hannes
> >
> >
> >
> > Qian Sun wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi, All
> >>
> >> I just submitted a new draft, it can be found here:
> >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00.txt
> >> Filename:        draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas
> >> Revision:        00
> >> Title:           Specifying Unsafe Areas in LoST Service Boundary
> >> Creation_date:   2008-07-01
> >> WG ID:           Independent Submission
> >> Number_of_pages: 8
> >>
> >> Abstract:
> >> This document describes how to specify unsafe areas in LoST for emergency
> >> services, such as police, mountain, marine and fire.
> >>
> >> Your comments are welcome!
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Qian
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Ecrit mailing list
> >> Ecrit at ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit