Re: [Ecrit] Comments for draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00

["Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig at nsn.com>]

Correct, and this document also makes far more sense for me. 



>Thanks for comments!
>
>In another draft we use this way you suggested to find safe areas:
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sun-ecrit-shelter-service-00
>
>Regards,
>Qian
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Karl Heinz Wolf [mailto:khwolf1 at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 4:20 PM
>> To: Hannes Tschofenig
>> Cc: Qian Sun; ecrit at ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Comments for draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I also read the draft, and like Hannes, my first thought was about a 
>> separate service URN for this propose.
>> 
>> One additional comment:
>> When the unsafe-Information is included to the Mapping 
>Information of 
>> a particular PSAP, there could be a problem when a PSAP is 
>responsible 
>> for a large area. Assuming a police PSAP is responsible for a whole 
>> federal state, there may be hundreds of unsafe areas inside 
>- and most 
>> of them will be far away from my current location. So it 
>could be more 
>> interesting to query for all unsafe-areas within a radius of 5 km, 
>> regardless of the service boundary of a particular PSAP.
>> 
>> cheers
>> karl heinz
>> 
>> On Fri, Jul 4, 2008 at 7:25 PM, Hannes Tschofenig 
>> <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net> wrote:
>> > Hi Qian,
>> >
>> > thanks for the document. Interesting usage of LoST.
>> >
>> > A few quick comments:
>> >
>> > * I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to define some 
>new service 
>> > URNs for the usage of these "unsafe" areas instead of 
>adding a new attribute.
>> > The reason for this is that the existing service URNs are somewhat 
>> > difficult to use in this context. For example, what does 
>it mean to 
>> > have the unsafe attribute included in the request when the 
>> > "urn:service:sos.poison" URN is used? New URNs are being proposed, 
>> > such as those in
>> >
>> 
>http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-forte-ecrit-service-classification-00.t
>> xt,
>> > that make the semantic even more difficult to interpret.
>> >
>> > * Would be useful to include an element in the reponse to point to 
>> > more detailed information, such as a URL to a webpage?
>> >
>> > * Deployment: Who do you think would want to run such a service? 
>> > Would this be something the PSAP operator would want todo? Tourism 
>> > office? Police departments? (I am trying to figure out 
>where to get 
>> > some feedback from.)
>> >
>> > How often do you think the "service boundaries" of these unsafe 
>> > areas change? (Keep constant for years vs. change every day)
>> >
>> > Ciao
>> > Hannes
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Qian Sun wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi, All
>> >>
>> >> I just submitted a new draft, it can be found here:
>> >> 
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas-00.txt
>> >> Filename:        draft-sun-ecrit-unsafe-areas
>> >> Revision:        00
>> >> Title:           Specifying Unsafe Areas in LoST Service Boundary
>> >> Creation_date:   2008-07-01
>> >> WG ID:           Independent Submission
>> >> Number_of_pages: 8
>> >>
>> >> Abstract:
>> >> This document describes how to specify unsafe areas in LoST for 
>> >> emergency services, such as police, mountain, marine and fire.
>> >>
>> >> Your comments are welcome!
>> >>
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> Qian
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Ecrit mailing list
>> >> Ecrit at ietf.org
>> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>> >>
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ecrit mailing list
>> > Ecrit at ietf.org
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit