[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ecrit] ECRIT Status Update: July 2008




Thanks for the feedback.

..... although our response was quite different.

The main difference is in the fact that there are different views on how the overal architecture for early warning would look like. SIP is very likely to be part of it but there are more challenges ahead of us...

Ciao
Hannes

Spencer


At 03:06 PM 7/8/2008, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
Would you be willing to work on early warning related aspects?

I would think that the ADs would be looking for two things in deciding what to do with early warning -

- will this use the same protocol? and

"SIP"

SIP solves everything, right?

but seriously, it will be a different part of SIP (mostly through notifications and subscriptions, and not focused very much on INVITEs (and related requests))

I think this is fairly obvious to most


- is this the same group of people doing the work?

a subset (the pure public safety (PSAP folks) would leave, unless personally interested), plus new additions (the early warning folks - which is a different part of government organization)

I think the vendors would remain largely the same

of course, this is my own opinion


I'd expect that feedback on these two points would be most helpful...

Spencer

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit



_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit