Re: [Ecrit] emergency call termination

[<g.caron at bell.ca>]

Thank you Ted for taking the time to look at this.

Regardless of the outcome of your proposal within ECRIT, do you agree that this particular UA behavior should be modulated by the requirements/rules of the jurisdictions since it simply reflects today's situation?

Thanks,

Guy Caron
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Ted Hardie [mailto:hardie at qualcomm.com] 
Envoyé : 10 juillet 2008 12:22
À : Caron, Guy (A162859); ecrit at ietf.org
Cc : nena-i2_5 at listserv.neustar.biz
Objet : Re: [Ecrit] emergency call termination

At 12:31 PM -0700 7/7/08, g.caron at bell.ca wrote:
>Dear ECRIT,
>
>NENA wishes to provide comments regarding "emergency call termination"
>behavior in -framework-05 and -phonebcp-04.
>
>The UA behavior currently defined disallows a UA engaged in an emergency
>communication to release the call and states that only the PSAP should
>be able to terminate an emergency call.

Sorry for the late comment on this, but having thought about this a bit,
I agree that this should not be mandatory.  If a caller realizes after
starting the call that it is not an emergency (the person choking has
their airway clear; the parent realizes a child has dialed 911, whatever),
they should be able to terminate the call. 

>NENA wishes to express that this behavior, while desired or mandated in
>certain jurisdictions, is undesirable in others. For example, the
>majority of the U.S. jurisdictions do not use this feature and prefer to
>allow the caller to release an emergency call.
>
>It is not NENA's intent to revert the current behavior in such a way
>that the caller has always the ability to release an emergency call.
>NENA would like however that this feature be made optional and
>controlled at the PSAP end. This would allow a roaming device to adjust
>its behavior according to the rules of the jurisdiction it is currently
>in.

Though I am no expert in this, it's my understanding that this is
not behavior supported by the current cellular networks, so I
believe that it would be both simpler and more appropriate to
define user terminated calls as permitted behavior.
			regards,
				Ted





>Thanks,
>
>
>Guy Caron
>On behalf of NENA
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit