[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ecrit] Additional text - location mech - wireless &mobilitysupport



I'm not as easy to please as Barbara...

I don't see why there is a continual insistence on distinguishing between "mobile" and "fixed" in relation to how location is generated.  The number of cases where this distinction is confusing or misleading only seems to increase over time.  Location generation methods and mobility should be considered orthogonal.  At least leave that up to the device/LIS.  Be clear on what the discussion requires and focus on that perspective.  Never try to imply some correlation between the two.

Since this is talking about the mechanism involved in location generation, I'd prefer to see this bit removed:  ", for mobile capable or fixed environment endpoints".

Cheers,
Martin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Stark, Barbara
> Sent: Tuesday, 2 December 2008 6:48 AM
> To: Roger Marshall; Rosen, Brian
> Cc: ecrit at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Additional text - location mech - wireless
> &mobilitysupport
> 
> Yep. That's fine.
> Barbara
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger Marshall [mailto:RMarshall at telecomsys.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 11:57 AM
> To: Stark, Barbara; Rosen, Brian
> Cc: ecrit at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Additional text - location mech - wireless &
> mobilitysupport
> 
> Barbara:
> 
> I acknowledge the wording problem (and the bigger deployment problem).
> 
> How about just shortening the sentence a little by removing the
> offending word, "respectively"... as follows:
> 
> " Requirements for
> endpoint location determination vary, depending on whether an
> endpoint's resulting location is based on internal
> (device-based) or external (network-based) measurements, or
> by manual provisioning, for mobile capable or fixed
> environment endpoints.  "
> 
> -roger.
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stark, Barbara [mailto:bs7652 at att.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 01, 2008 7:59 AM
> > To: Roger Marshall; Rosen, Brian
> > Cc: ecrit at ietf.org
> > Subject: RE: [Ecrit] Additional text - location mech -
> > wireless & mobilitysupport
> >
> > I don't understand this proposed sentence: " Requirements for
> > endpoint location determination vary, depending on whether an
> > endpoint's resulting location is based on internal
> > (device-based) or external (network-based) measurements, or
> > by manual provisioning - for mobile capable, or fixed
> > environment endpoints, respectively.  "
> >
> > That is, I understand the first part, up to the dash "-". I
> > don't understand the part after the dash "-", specifically
> > the use of the word "respectively".
> >
> > Is a Femtocell access point (which connects via Ethernet into
> > the LAN of a home network that is connected by a broadband
> > connection to the
> > Internet) mobile capable or fixed? The FAP itself is
> > certainly *not* mobile. It will be able to use GPS or AGPS
> > (with SUPL) to get its location determined. It will also need
> > to be able to use other methods to get its location when it
> > finds itself in a basement, unable to make use of GPS.
> >
> > Is a GSM/Wi-Fi PDA that is in someone's basement (where GPS
> > doesn't work, and they can't get a cellular signal), and is
> > connected via Wi-Fi into a home network, supposed to use
> > internal or external measurements?
> > It's definitely mobile capable.
> > Barbara
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org]
> > On Behalf Of Roger Marshall
> > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 5:35 PM
> > To: Rosen, Brian
> > Cc: ecrit at ietf.org
> > Subject: [Ecrit] Additional text - location mech - wireless &
> > mobilitysupport
> >
> >
> >
> > Brian:
> > Below is a proposed change in text to the current phonebcp-06
> > that adds some background for various requirements later in
> > the draft that specify "wireless" and "mobile", per remarks
> > made in the 11/20 ECRIT wg meeting.
> >
> > 1. Section 6. Location and its role in emergency calls
> >
> > change from:
> >
> > In Internet emergency calling, where the endpoint is located
> > is "determined" using a variety of measurement or wiretracing
> > methods.  Endpoints may be "configured" with their own
> > location by the access network.
> >
> > change to:
> >
> > In Internet emergency calling, the endpoint location is
> > "determined" using a variety of measurement or wiretracing
> > methods.  Requirements for endpoint location determination
> > vary, depending on whether an endpoint's resulting location
> > is based on internal (device-based) or external
> > (network-based) measurements, or by manual provisioning - for
> > mobile capable, or fixed environment endpoints, respectively.
> >  Once location has been determined, endpoints may then be
> > "configured" with their own location by the access network
> > via some Location Configuration Protocol (LCP).
> >
> >
> > -roger marshall.
> >
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this
> > message may be privileged and/or confidential. If you are not
> > the intended recipient, or responsible for delivering this
> > message to the intended recipient, any review, forwarding,
> > dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication
> > or any attachment(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this message in error, please notify the sender
> > immediately, and delete it and all attachments from your
> > computer and network.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ecrit mailing list
> > Ecrit at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
> >
> > *****
> >
> > The information transmitted is intended only for the person
> > or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> > confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged material. Any
> > review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or
> > taking of any action in reliance upon this information by
> > persons or entities other than the intended recipient is
> > prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the
> > sender and delete the material from all computers. GA622
> >
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit