Re: [Ecrit] HUM regarding draft-rosen-ecrit-premature-disconnect-rqmts

["Brian Rosen" <br at brianrosen.net>]

Just a note that I was requested to issue an update to this document which
recasts the requirement in human observation/response language, completely
avoiding any signaling wording.  I have a draft which has been reviewed by
NENA.  They like the current version a lot more than the new one, but the
new one does capture the essence of the problem.  I will publish it to the
IETF today.

Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 4:51 AM
To: ECRIT
Subject: [Ecrit] HUM regarding draft-rosen-ecrit-premature-disconnect-rqmts

Hi all, 

We had a fair amount of discussions regarding this item and, as
mentioned in my status update, we would like to resolve the deadlock we
currently have. 

We would like to get some feedback from the group. 

Are you OK with turning draft-rosen-ecrit-premature-disconnect-rqmts
into a working group item (after rechartering) (under the assumption
that the editor of the document is changed once the document is a WG
item)?

Deadline: 19. Jan. 2009

Ciao
Hannes & Marc

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit