Re: [Ecrit] draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00]

[Karl Heinz Wolf <khwolf1 at gmail.com>]

Wouldn't the ADDCODE (Additional Code) element be a good place for the
lamp number code?

karl heinz

On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Winterbottom, James
<James.Winterbottom at andrew.com> wrote:
> A couple of things.
>
> First this should be posted to geopriv and ecrit.
>
> Secondly, could these not be covered by the LOC and landmark fields?
>
> Cheers
> James
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Robins George
> Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2009 2:24 PM
> To: ECRIT IETF
> Subject: [Ecrit] draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00]
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have submitted a draft which describes an extension to civic location
> format and
> adds new element PN (pole number). PN carries utility and lamp post
> number
> information which can identify a civic location.
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00
>
> Comments are appreciated.
>
> Regards,
> Robins.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This message is for the designated recipient only and may
> contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
> If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
> immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
> this email is prohibited.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [mf2]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>