[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add "applicability" statement to -framework/-phonebcp

"but such cases (and any associated issues) are not covered extensively in this document; rather, they are left for future study in other documents." 


DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:

Where you have said "network to take a more expansive role", I think generally we need to say we have not addressed the issues that may arise where it does so. That is essentially the crux of the difference between the two models, and we have agreed in the past that there is a framework/phonebcp phase 2 will attempt to address this issue.

Keith


-----Original Message-----
From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Barnes 
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 12:07 AM
To: James M. Polk
Cc: Rosen, Brian; ECRIT
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add "applicability" statement to -framework/-phonebcp 

Updated proposal:
This document describes an architecture for emergency calling in the typical Internet environment, in which the calling device bears most of the burden of implementing emergency calls, and the caller's Internet Service Provider has a supporting role. The underlying specifications allow for the network to take a more expansive role in emergency calls, but such cases are not covered extensively in this document (they are left for future study in other documents). 



James M. Polk wrote:

At 06:34 PM 3/23/2009, Rosen, Brian wrote:

Some other document, in some other organization probably.
could that be said - to leave the read knowing we are purposely not answering the question "here". 



Brian

-----Original Message-----
From: James M. Polk [mailto:jmpolk at cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:33 PM
To: Richard Barnes; Rosen, Brian
Cc: ECRIT
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add "applicability" statement to -framework/-phonebcp 

both versions beg the question:

         - so where are they covered?

(re: the end of the last sentence)

James

At 06:27 PM 3/23/2009, Richard Barnes wrote:

Editorial changes:
This document describes an architecture for emergency
calling in the
typical Internet environment, in which the calling device
bears most
of the burden of implementing emergency calls, and the
caller's IP
access network has a supporting role. The underlying
specifications
allow for the network to take a more expansive role in emergency calls, but such cases are not covered extensively in this 
document.



Rosen, Brian wrote:
In the meeting, there was not consensus on having applicability statements. I would like to propose the following be 
added to both

documents:
This document describes a typical Internet environment where the endpoint device bears most of the burden of implementing
emergency
calls, and the origination network has a minor role. The underlying specifications permit the network to take a more expansive role in emergency calls, which Is not covered 
extensively in this document.



-------------------------------------------------------------------

---

--

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit



_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit