[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability" statementto -framework/-phonebcp
- To: "'Randall Gellens'" <randy at qualcomm.com>, "'Stark, Barbara'" <bs7652 at att.com>, "'Brian Rosen'" <br at brianrosen.net>, "'Richard Barnes'" <rbarnes at bbn.com>
- Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability" statementto -framework/-phonebcp
- From: "Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:41:28 -0700
- Cc: "'Dawson, Martin'" <Martin.Dawson at andrew.com>, ecrit at ietf.org, "'Rosen, Brian'" <Brian.Rosen at neustar.biz>
- Delivered-to: ecrit at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <p06240615c5ef015f2d5f at [172.28.176.165]>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
- List-help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <C80ADC57CB3BB64B94A9954A816306C5014FE6D7 at STNTEXCH11.cis.neustar.com><EB921991A86A974C80EAFA46AD428E1E055D7F05 at aopex4.andrew.com><49C91795.9030208 at bbn.com><00fd01c9acac$575e73d0$061b5b70$ at net><49C92E99.8080909 at bbn.com><013201c9acbd$31938e40$94baaac0$ at net><7582BC68E4994F4ABF0BD4723975C3FA0D88065B at crexc41p> <p06240615c5ef015f2d5f at [172.28.176.165]>
- Thread-index: AcmsyBfU3lfwG7J7SKimj48KL7vxAwAARTHg
Btw, is the plan to put similar statements into 3GPP, etc. documents as
well?
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org]
>On Behalf Of Randall Gellens
>Sent: 24 March, 2009 14:32
>To: Stark, Barbara; Brian Rosen; Richard Barnes
>Cc: Dawson, Martin; ecrit at ietf.org; Rosen,Brian
>Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability"
>statementto -framework/-phonebcp
>
>At 4:35 PM -0400 3/24/09, Barbara Stark wrote:
>
>> I was doing fine with the course of this discussion till this
>> "interoperability" word came into the picture. I'm not convinced we
>> have an "interoperability issue". I do think that how this
>framework
>> "interconnects" to other networks is something that is not
>covered in
>> this document, and that it would be ok to say that this
>isn't covered.
>
>How about a sentence such as "Interworking between the
>framework described here and other frameworks is not currently
>specified."
>
>--
>Randall Gellens
>Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
>-------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- Language
>is a virus from outer space. --William S. Burroughs
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>