[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability" statementto -framework/-phonebcp
- To: "Randall Gellens" <randy at qualcomm.com>, "Stark, Barbara" <bs7652 at att.com>, "Brian Rosen" <br at brianrosen.net>, "Richard Barnes" <rbarnes at bbn.com>
- Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability" statementto -framework/-phonebcp
- From: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson at andrew.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:41:40 -0500
- Cc: "Dawson, Martin" <Martin.Dawson at andrew.com>, ecrit at ietf.org, "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen at neustar.biz>
- Delivered-to: ecrit at core3.amsl.com
- In-reply-to: <p06240615c5ef015f2d5f at [172.28.176.165]>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
- List-help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <C80ADC57CB3BB64B94A9954A816306C5014FE6D7 at STNTEXCH11.cis.neustar.com><EB921991A86A974C80EAFA46AD428E1E055D7F05 at aopex4.andrew.com><49C91795.9030208 at bbn.com><00fd01c9acac$575e73d0$061b5b70$ at net><49C92E99.8080909 at bbn.com><013201c9acbd$31938e40$94baaac0$ at net><7582BC68E4994F4ABF0BD4723975C3FA0D88065B at crexc41p> <p06240615c5ef015f2d5f at [172.28.176.165]>
- Thread-index: AcmsyBhB2HdHrWARSfGfD8aaoundzgAAIksA
- Thread-topic: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability" statementto -framework/-phonebcp
That's what is commonly referred to as a "forward looking statement". I don't like the use of "currently" or "at the time of writing", or anything like that.
I've watched this discussion with faltering interest. My feeling is that this is an almost farcical waste of our time.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Randall Gellens
> Sent: Tuesday, 24 March 2009 2:32 PM
> To: Stark, Barbara; Brian Rosen; Richard Barnes
> Cc: Dawson, Martin; ecrit at ietf.org; Rosen,Brian
> Subject: Re: [Ecrit] Proposal to add"applicability" statementto -
> framework/-phonebcp
>
> At 4:35 PM -0400 3/24/09, Barbara Stark wrote:
>
> > I was doing fine with the course of this discussion till this
> > "interoperability" word came into the picture. I'm not convinced we
> have
> > an "interoperability issue". I do think that how this framework
> > "interconnects" to other networks is something that is not covered
> in
> > this document, and that it would be ok to say that this isn't
> covered.
>
> How about a sentence such as "Interworking between the framework
> described here and other frameworks is not currently specified."
>
> --
> Randall Gellens
> Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
> -------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
> Language is a virus from outer space. --William S. Burroughs
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]