Re: [Ecrit] Reset button: ECRIT text

["Hannes Tschofenig" <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

I don't agree that the area where the application service providers takes a
more expansive role in emergency calls is for further study. 

What do we actually mean by the most of the burden of implementing emergency
calls? 

Ciao
Hannes

>-----Original Message-----
>From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] 
>On Behalf Of Richard Barnes
>Sent: 25 March, 2009 17:24
>To: ECRIT
>Subject: [Ecrit] Reset button: ECRIT text
>
><http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2009/03/06/Cli
>nton%20and%20Lavrov-thumb-320x374.jpg>
>
>Proposal (latest from previous thread, due to Linsner):
>
>This document describes an architecture for emergency calling 
>contained within the common Internet environment. In this 
>environment, the originating host bears most of the burden of 
>implementing emergency calls, and the caller's Access Network 
>Provider may have a supporting role.  If such exists, the 
>caller's Application Service Provider plays a minor role.  The 
>underlying specifications do allow for the Application Service 
>Provider to take a more expansive role in emergency calls. 
>However, such cases and any associated issues that arise 
>outside this environment are for further study.
>
>If you have comments, please submit a revision to the above proposal.
>
>--Richard
>_______________________________________________
>Ecrit mailing list
>Ecrit at ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>