Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

I assume you’re referring to the following paragraph in the introduction:

“   This document focuses on the case in which all three steps in the

emergency calling process -- location configuration, call routing,

and call placement - can be and are performed by the calling

endpoint, with the endpoint's Access Service Provider supporting the

process by providing location information. Calls in this case may be

routed via an application-layer Communications Service Provider

(e.g., a Voice Service Provider), but need not be. The underlying

protocols can also be used to support other models in which parts of

the process are delegated to the Communications Service Provider.

This document does not address in detail either these models or

interoperability issues between them and the model described here.”

Yes, I accept this.

Barbara

From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marc Linsner
Sent: Friday, April 24, 2009 2:24 PM
To: ECRIT
Subject: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ecrit-phonebcp-09.txt

At the San Francisco meeting and ensuing list threads, the last issue around PhoneBCP was whether or not to include an ‘applicability statement’. The hum during the meeting was inconclusive. The draft editor has included text in this latest version in an attempt to compromise on this issue.

Please review this version and respond by Friday May 1 to the list as to your acceptance of this change.

Thanks,

Marc, Hannes, & Roger