Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

["Winterbottom, James" <James.Winterbottom at andrew.com>]

I am sorry that that time was spent debating the text, since procedure
would dictate that before text be considered consensus on whether it is
needed must be reached. Since the former did not occur, the latter is
kind of moot.



-----Original Message-----
From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Randall Gellens
Sent: Tuesday, 28 April 2009 10:25 AM
To: ECRIT
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

I hum for the text, which doesn't constrain the use of the protocols, 
but merely describes the assumptions under which it works.  As such, 
it is useful and helpful.  Even for those who think the assumptions 
are obvious, it does no harm to state them.

We had a lot of debate on this in SFO, and the text in this version 
was discussed on the mailing list in the days during and following 
the meeting.
-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
One's need for loneliness is not satisfied if one sits at a table alone.
There must be empty chairs as well.                        --Karl Kraus
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the designated recipient only and may
contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender
immediately and delete the original.  Any unauthorized use of
this email is prohibited.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[mf2]