[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
- To: "Gellens, Randall" <randy at qualcomm.com>, Henning Schulzrinne <hgs at cs.columbia.edu>, "Stark, Barbara" <bs7652 at att.com>, ECRIT <ecrit at ietf.org>
- Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
- From: "Edge, Stephen" <sedge at qualcomm.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 10:29:59 -0700
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- Delivered-to: ecrit at core3.amsl.com
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=sedge at qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1240939802; x=1272475802; h=from:to:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:x-ironport-av; z=From:=20"Edge,=20Stephen"=20<sedge at qualcomm.com>|To:=20" Gellens,=20Randall"=20<randy at qualcomm.com>,=0D=0A=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20=20Henning=20Schulzrinne=0D=0A=09<hgs at cs.c olumbia.edu>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20"Stark,=20Barb ara"=20<bs7652 at att.com>,=20ECRIT=0D=0A=09<ecrit at ietf.org> |Date:=20Tue,=2028=20Apr=202009=2010:29:59=20-0700 |Subject:=20RE:=20[Ecrit]=20PhoneBCP|Thread-Topic:=20[Ecr it]=20PhoneBCP|Thread-Index:=20AcnIIvqh4HtW4THrQ3WLstV8Jn SWmQAAVJtA|Message-ID:=20<1288E74A73964940B132A0B9EA8D8AB C5926A365 at NASANEXMB04.na.qualcomm.com>|References:=20<C61 77BF4.147ED%mlinsner at cisco.com><p0624080dc617d32a1604 at [10 .227.68.1=0932]>=0D=0A=09<49F27637.7050201 at bbn.com><E51D5 B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF104A3430A at AH=0D=0A=09QEX1.andre w.com><058701c9c5d0$53c5ef40$fb51cdc0$ at net><E51D5B15BFDEF D44=0D=0A=098F90BDD17D41CFF104A3430B at AHQEX1.andrew.com><2 8B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217A=0D=0A=09BE78D67590BD8E at FRMRSSXC HMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>=0D=0A=09<p0624060ac61bfca 58f3b at [172.28.171.53]>=0D=0A=09<7582BC68E4994F4ABF0BD4723 975C3FA0E0471BA at crexc41p>=0D=0A=09<F558286E-B950-43B2-9FB 6-52FCBECBB3D1 at cs.columbia.edu>=0D=0A=20<p06240613c61ce56 7d224 at [172.28.171.53]>|In-Reply-To:=20<p06240613c61ce567d 224 at [172.28.171.53]>|Accept-Language:=20en-US |Content-Language:=20en-US|X-MS-Has-Attach: |X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage:=20en-US |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii" |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi=3D"5 300,2777,5599"=3B=20a=3D"17544371"; bh=5fGN3d7B6Ilitr/3qAcDvhvMaLGW5/h6sMqjO4XgJi8=; b=vzsrl9BkgKodxaVRKXIL1yILf95xSu6ef1RXP69mXy/zYp19qU1QqVUX O4LVFX/mlyB9NmzZFZsG6whPZ0BZt+WYapTnOxRuhvs6ZdSWqFkZgmqsi kSPol6ew4q9Nd6MB++K5/yYoxN7N+LnyXfgpr675qZtS8S0a4qCtuuM/A o=;
- In-reply-to: <p06240613c61ce567d224 at [172.28.171.53]>
- List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ecrit>
- List-help: <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
- List-id: <ecrit.ietf.org>
- List-post: <mailto:ecrit@ietf.org>
- List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
- List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit>, <mailto:ecrit-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
- References: <C6177BF4.147ED%mlinsner at cisco.com><p0624080dc617d32a1604 at [10.227.68.1 32]> <49F27637.7050201 at bbn.com><E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF104A3430A at AH QEX1.andrew.com><058701c9c5d0$53c5ef40$fb51cdc0$ at net><E51D5B15BFDEFD44 8F90BDD17D41CFF104A3430B at AHQEX1.andrew.com><28B7C3AA2A7ABA4A841F11217A BE78D67590BD8E at FRMRSSXCHMBSB3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <p0624060ac61bfca58f3b at [172.28.171.53]> <7582BC68E4994F4ABF0BD4723975C3FA0E0471BA at crexc41p> <F558286E-B950-43B2-9FB6-52FCBECBB3D1 at cs.columbia.edu> <p06240613c61ce567d224 at [172.28.171.53]>
- Thread-index: AcnIIvqh4HtW4THrQ3WLstV8JnSWmQAAVJtA
- Thread-topic: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
All
I would have thought that motivation should be irrelevant. There are a lot of motives at work here. Should we assume that the document was originally written with only the purest and most altruistic motives (e.g. no thought of business or academic interest at stake)?
The issue is whether the current statement serves a useful purpose in conveying the possibility (well known to be true) of alternative solutions not fully aligned with the current drafts. Nothing in the statement implies that the current drafts are necessarily deficient or that alternative solutions must necessarily be used for some scenarios (even though they optionally can be).
Kind Regards
Stephen
-----Original Message-----
From: ecrit-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Randall Gellens
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2009 9:57 AM
To: Henning Schulzrinne; Stark, Barbara
Cc: ECRIT
Subject: Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP
At 11:14 AM -0400 4/28/09, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> It is clear that the text has ulterior motives to restrict the
> applicability of the document.
From my view, the text does not restrict the applicability, nor is
there a desire to do so. The text does clarify the assumptions of
the rest of the text in the document, which I think is helpful.
--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
The solution to a problem changes the nature of the problem.
_______________________________________________
Ecrit mailing list
Ecrit at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit