[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Ecrit] PhoneBCP

+1


Besides, ED-6 isn't back.
editorial: ED-9 isn't exactly the same text on it's two occurrences.


karl heinz

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Marc Linsner <mlinsner at cisco.com> wrote:
> [chair hat off]
>
> +1
>
> -Marc-
>
>
> On 4/27/09 9:42 AM, "Henning Schulzrinne" <hgs at cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:34 AM, Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo) wrote:
>>
>>> I hum against the applicability statement. I cannot see why we need
>>> one.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ciao
>>> Hannes
>>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ecrit mailing list
> Ecrit at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ecrit
>