Re: [Hokeyp] [Emu] Re: MSK but no EMSK

[Yoshihiro Ohba <yohba at tari.toshiba.com>]

On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 03:15:46PM -0500, Blumenthal, Uri wrote:

(snip)

> Let's dispense with flawed analogies and stick to the point. Which is:
> the WG decided that the way EAP evolves it needs two cryptographically
> indpendent "generator keys" MSK and EMSK, with usage model for the 2nd
> one still being considered. It is obvious however that it is much better
> to have a key and not need to use it than the other way around - having
> a need for a cryptographically independent key and not having a source
> for it.

Agreed.

Yoshihiro Ohba


_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu