Re: [Hokeyp] [Emu] Re: MSK but no EMSK

[Julien Laganier <julien.IETF at laposte.net>]

On Friday 17 November 2006 11:35, Yoshihiro Ohba wrote:
> Hi Uri,
>
> I have a different view.  Mandating generation of
> EMSK without having defined its usage *when it was
> introduced* seems not much different from not having
> defining it at all.

I think this is exactly the other way around.

*Mandating* generation of EMSK without having defined 
its usage when it was introduced make it possible to 
later define how it should be used, and use it.

That's why it's been *mandated* :)

--julien

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu