RE: [Emu] Thoughts on Password-based EAP Methods
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Emu] Thoughts on Password-based EAP Methods



I'm not sure that adding yet another version to TTLS specifically for
supporting passwords will make things better for customers.  Multiple
versions certainly has caused quite a confusion in PEAP.

I would agree that "versioning" is not a good idea. However, as I understand it, EAP-TTLSv0 is the only deployed version of TTLS; v1 has never been implemented. So currently there is no versioning issue with TTLS, and if possible, it would be best if the IETF would not create such a problem.


It is not clear to me that EAP-TTLS needs "versioning" in order to enable addition of new features in a backwards compatible way, since it already supports a TLV-based extension mechanism.



_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu




Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.