Re: [Emu] Next Steps on Passwd-based EAP Methods

[Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig at gmx.net>]

I also need to say that at the IETF#68 EMU WG meeting the discussions in 
the room where pretty positive for moving forward with a simple 
password-based EAP method using TLS without another EAP encapsulation on 
top of TLS. I also got the impression after the session that the people 
in the room where happy with the tentative decisions we made. I had a 
clear picture in mind how to move forward with the work on this topic.

I only recall a single person in the room that raised some concerns.

Ciao
Hannes

PS: To clarify my position: I also have no problem with working on 
TTLSv1 (as I expressed on the DT mailing list). This would, however, 
require the TLS working group to work on the TLS Inner Application, 
which I also think is useful. This approach was, however, ruled out by 
the ADs.

Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> before we spend more time considering EAP tunneling methods like PEAP 
> and TTLS I would like to hear the opinion of our ADs on this subject.
> So far, the working assumption was that EAP methods that tunnel EAP 
> are outside the scope of the working group. These statements were also 
> repeated during the IETF#68 EMU WG meeting by our ADs.
>
> We seem to change the assumptions on the fly.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu


_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu