RE: [Emu] 2716bis13: Support of certificate_status extension
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Emu] 2716bis13: Support of certificate_status extension
Hi Madjid,
Comments inline below:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nakhjiri Madjid-VXT746 [mailto:madjid.nakhjiri at motorola.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 5:03 PM
> To: bernarda at windows.microsoft.com; emu at ietf.org
> Subject: [Emu] 2716bis13: Support of certificate_status extension
>
> Hi,
>
> Question on the following text:
>
>
>
> "However, in the case where the EAP-TLS peer is attempting to
> obtain network access, it will not have network connectivity
> and is therefore not capable of checking for certificate
> revocation until after authentication completes and network
> connectivity is available. For this reason EAP-TLS peers and
> servers SHOULD implement Certificate Status Request messages,
> as described in "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Extensions"
> [RFC4366] section 3.6. To enable revocation checking in
> situations where servers do not support Certificate Status
> Request messages and network connectivity is not available
> prior to authentication completion, peer implementations MUST
> also support checking for certificate revocation after
> authentication completes and network connectivity is
> available, and they SHOULD utilize this capability by default."
>
>
>
> In cases where the server does not support the
> certificate_status extension, this is a little awkward, the
> server's cert is expired, but the server does not support the
> extension. The client has already gotten access to the
> network after EAP-TLS and so both TLS and the EAP exchange is
> terminated by an EAP Success. How is the spec suggesting the
> client to perform the revocation checking?
[Joe] Once the client has network access it can attempt to access CRLs
or certificate status services using existing mechanisms (CRL
distribution points, OCSP, etc.)
> and what is the
> process to break the network access (ignoring the question on
> why a client who would otherwise be a paying customer, really
> wanted this) after already have gained the access?
>
[Joe] The process depends upon the client and underlying network access
technology.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Madjid
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.