[Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2

To: emu at ietf.org
Subject: [Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2
From: Ali Fessi <ali.fessi at uni-tuebingen.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:38:39 +0200
Delivered-to: ietfarch-emu-web-archive at core3.amsl.com
Delivered-to: emu at core3.amsl.com
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/emu>
List-help: <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: "EAP Methods Update \(EMU\)" <emu.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:emu@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu>, <mailto:emu-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: emu-bounces at ietf.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)

Hi,

I wonder why the IKEv2 exchange in EAP-IKEv2 is initiated by the server.

(See, RFC 5106, Page 7, Figure 1, message 3)

Is the reason to save two messages, for example, compared to EAP-TLS?

Best,
  Ali

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2
  - From: Hannes Tschofenig

Prev by Date: Re: [Emu] comment on draft-ietf-emu-eap-gpsk
Next by Date: [Emu] EMU charter revision
Previous by thread: [Emu] comment on draft-ietf-emu-eap-gpsk
Next by thread: Re: [Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2

Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.