Re: [Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2
Hannes,
It was my understanding that authenticating the server first is an
essential behavior to prevent disclosing the user identity to an
imposter. This behavior is also part of EAP-FAST and EAP-TTLS.
Gene
------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
Eugene Chang (genchang)
Cisco Systems
Office: 603-559-2978
Mobile: 781-799-0233
Skype: gene02421
> -----Original Message-----
> From: emu-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:emu-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Hannes Tschofenig
> Sent: Sunday, May 04, 2008 11:56 AM
> To: Ali Fessi
> Cc: emu at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Emu] Question on EAP-IKEv2
>
> That's one reason.
>
> The other one is to be able to have a strong password based mechanism.
> When you reverse the roles of client and server then you allow the
> server to be authenticated first before you present your "password".
>
> Finally, reversing the roles allows you to offer active user identity
> confidentiality.
>
> Ciao
> Hannes
>
>
>
> Ali Fessi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder why the IKEv2 exchange in EAP-IKEv2 is initiated by the
server.
> >
> > (See, RFC 5106, Page 7, Figure 1, message 3)
> >
> > Is the reason to save two messages, for example, compared to
EAP-TLS?
> >
> > Best,
> > Ali
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emu mailing list
> > Emu at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.