[Emu] Issue #23: Tunnel Protection requirements
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Emu] Issue #23: Tunnel Protection requirements
#23: Tunnel Protection requirements
> Section 4.2.1.1.2
>
> "See Part 1 of the NIST Recommendation for
> Key Management [NIST SP 800-57] for a discussion of the relative
> strengths of common algorithms."
>
> Why not reference the NIST SP 800-120 requirements here?
>
> "o One-way key derivation
> o Cryptographically separated keys.
> o Cryptographically separated entities.
> o Identity binding
> o Context binding
> o Key lifetime
> o Mutual implicit key authentication
> o Key freshness"
>
> Given that this document assumes a TLS-based tunnel method,
> the text on requirements can be made considerably more
> specific and actionable based on TLS properties and the
> specific requirements of NIST 800-120.
> As it stands, a number of these requirements either don't
> apply to EAP methods at all (e.g. context binding, key
> lifetime) but rather to other elements of the system, or are
> automatically provided by TLS (e.g. key freshness, Identity
> binding).
>
> So these requirements need to be made actionable and
> specific. The ones that don't apply to the problem at hand
> (e.g. TLS-based tunnel euth) should be removed.
>
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/trac/ticket/23>
emu <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/>
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.