Re: [Emu] Revised sections for Issue #18 (Internationalization)

[Alan DeKok <aland at deployingradius.com>]

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I think the text proposed is mostly fine.  I would say "normalization
> and/or comparison" instead of just "normalization" to allow for
> mechanisms that just specify comparison-based rules rather than
> normalization-based rules.  So:

  The text looks OK to me.

  My only concern is that standardizing i18n in *each* possible EAP
document is duplicating work.  If we end up with only one tunnel method
that is standardized, then there's less of a problem.

  Alan DeKok.