Re: [Emu] IETF 83 agenda request: channel binding implementation

["Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig at nsn.com>]

I am looking forward to the discussion. 

I care about implementation specific aspects, particularly if they hide
some underlying problems. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: emu-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:emu-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> ext Sam Hartman
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 5:33 PM
> To: emu at ietf.org
> Cc: mrw at painless-security.com
> Subject: [Emu] IETF 83 agenda request: channel binding implementation
> 
> 
> I think that a number of participants will be familiar with some
channel
> binding implementation work by IETF 83 and I think it would be
valuable
> to brienf the WG on lessons learned.  At one level, we perhaps don't
> care about implementation-specific problems or issues that pop up when
> adding channel bindings to non-standards-track methods.
> 
> However, I think we have a lot to learn in terms of looking at similar
> issues that may cross implementations and in terms of what to specify
to
> get the security we need in new standards track methods.  So, I think
> this could really be worth a bit of discussion at IETF 83.
> _______________________________________________
> Emu mailing list
> Emu at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu