Enum Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Main Archive Directory]
- Oct 19 2005
- Oct 18 2005
- Re: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on IANA Registration for Enumservice Voice, Michael Haberler
- [Enum] More Experienced, lconroy
- [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-experiences-03.txt, Internet-Drafts
- [Enum] [Fwd: I-D submission: draft-lind-infrastructure-enum-reqs-01], Richard Shockey
- [Enum] FW: ENUM WG I-D: draft-ietf-enum-pstn-00.txt, Livingood, Jason
- RE: [Enum] Current Proposed Agenda for IETF 64, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- [Enum] Current Proposed Agenda for IETF 64, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on IANA Registration for Enumservice Voice, Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on IANA Registration for Enumservice Voice, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on IANA Registration for Enumservice Voice, Livingood, Jason
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, James McEachern
- Oct 16 2005
- Oct 15 2005
- Oct 14 2005
- Oct 13 2005
- Oct 12 2005
- Oct 11 2005
- Re: [Enum] voipeer agenda/charter uploaded, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] voipeer agenda/charter uploaded, David Meyer
- Re: [Enum] voipeer agenda/charter uploaded, Peter Williams
- Re: [Enum] voipeer agenda/charter uploaded, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] voipeer agenda/charter uploaded, Peter Williams
- [Enum] voipeer agenda/charter uploaded, David Meyer
- Re: [Enum] Validation of Carriers, Alexander Mayrhofer
- Re: [Enum] Validation of Carriers, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Validation of Carriers, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- [Enum] Validation of Carriers, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM - Oops, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00.txt, Otmar Lendl
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Lupton, Ronan
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Otmar Lendl
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Rosbotham, Paul
- Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00.txt, Peter Williams
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Nieminen Klaus
- Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Otmar Lendl
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Nieminen Klaus
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Nieminen Klaus
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM, Antoin Verschuren
- Re: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00.txt, Otmar Lendl
- RE: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-token-00.txt, Peter Williams
- Oct 10 2005
- Oct 09 2005
- Oct 08 2005
- Oct 07 2005
- Oct 06 2005
- RE: [voipeer] Re: [Enum] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enternumbers in Carrier ENUM?, Vince Humphries
- Re: [Enum] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enternumbers in Carrier ENUM?, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] Re: [voipeer] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enter numbers in Carrier ENUM?, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-validation-arch-00.txt, Internet-Drafts
- Re: [Enum] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enter numbers in Carrier ENUM?, james . f . baskin
- [Enum] RE: [voipeer] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enter numbers in Carrier ENUM?, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- [Enum] Re: [voipeer] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enter numbers in Carrier ENUM?, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] RE: [voipeer] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enter numbers in Carrier ENUM?, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- [Enum] What is a Carrier and who has the right to enter numbers in Carrier ENUM?, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, David Meyer
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, David Meyer
- Re: [Enum] ENUM and E911, Stastny Richard
- re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] ENUM and E911, Voipers Portugal
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-mayrhofer-enum-vcard-00.txt], Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Its that time again .... Agenda Items for IETF Vancouver, lconroy
- Oct 05 2005
- Oct 04 2005
- Oct 03 2005
- Oct 01 2005
- Sep 30 2005
- Sep 25 2005
- Sep 20 2005
- Sep 19 2005
- Sep 18 2005
- Sep 17 2005
- Sep 16 2005
- Sep 15 2005
- Sep 14 2005
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), lconroy
- RE: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Fullbrook Kim \(UK\)
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Klaus Darilion
- [Enum] GnuGK works with ENUM and H.323-URLs, Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Kewin Stoeckigt
- RE: [Enum] Carrier ENUM an applet of Voipeer (IP Interconnect), Schiefner, Carsten
- Sep 13 2005
- Sep 12 2005
- Sep 11 2005
- Sep 09 2005
- Sep 08 2005
- Sep 07 2005
- Sep 06 2005
- Sep 05 2005
- Sep 04 2005
- Sep 02 2005
- Sep 02 2005
- Aug 24 2005
- Aug 23 2005
- Aug 22 2005
- Aug 21 2005
- Aug 20 2005
- [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY Version 3, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY Version 2, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Paul Kyzivat
- RE: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple]telURIsin commonpolicy, Dolly, Martin C, ALABS
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY Version 2, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] Discussion and acceptance of Carrier / Private ENUM items dependent on WG recharter., Richard Shockey
- [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY Version 2, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Richard Shockey
- Aug 19 2005
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Tom-PT Taylor
- RE: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] telURIsin commonpolicy, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- [Enum] ENUM WG Document Authors Please Note ..., Richard Shockey
- Aug 18 2005
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsincommonpolicy, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsincommonpolicy, Brian Rosen
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsin commonpolicy, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsin commonpolicy, Mpierce1
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsin commonpolicy, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsin commonpolicy, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIsin commonpolicy, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Peter Williams
- Re: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in commonpolicy, Jonathan Rosenberg
- RE: [Enum] RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Tom-PT Taylor
- RE: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs incommonpolicy, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in commonpolicy, Brian Rosen
- [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, James M. Polk
- [Enum] RE: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] Re: [voipeer] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Otmar Lendl
- [Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy, Jonathan Rosenberg
- Aug 17 2005
- Aug 12 2005
- Aug 11 2005
- Re: [Enum] Now that carrier enum is seperate, will user enum ever be deployed?, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Now that carrier enum is seperate, will user enum ever be deployed?, lconroy
- Re: [Enum] Now that carrier enum is seperate, will user enum ever be deployed?, Michael Haberler
- [Enum] Now that carrier enum is seperate, will user enum ever be deployed?, Michael Mealling
- RE: [Enum] Carrier ENUM, Rosbotham, Paul
- [Enum] Carrier ENUM, Stastny Richard
- Aug 10 2005
- Aug 08 2005
- Aug 04 2005
- [Enum] Re: [voipeer] voipeer BOF presentations, Bob Briscoe
- RE: [Enum] voipeer BOF presentations, John Horrocks
- [Enum] RE: [Sipping] voipeer BOF scheduling update, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- [Enum] RE: [Sipping] voipeer BOF scheduling update, Khan, Sohel Q [NTK]
- [Enum] Re: [Sipping] voipeer BOF scheduling update, Hisham Khartabil
- [Enum] RE: [Sipping] voipeer BOF scheduling update, Romascanu, Dan \(Dan\)
- RE: : [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-01.txt, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- [Enum] voipeer BOF presentations, David Meyer
- Aug 03 2005
- Aug 02 2005
- Aug 01 2005
- Jul 31 2005
- Jul 30 2005
- Jul 29 2005
- Jul 28 2005
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Alexander Mayrhofer
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, James McEachern
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Jim Reid
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Peter Williams
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Fullbrook Kim \(UK\)
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Otmar Lendl
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Jul 27 2005
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, James McEachern
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, James McEachern
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, McCandless, Kevin
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Haberler
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, James McEachern
- Jul 26 2005
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, McCandless, Kevin
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Ray Anderson
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Otmar Lendl
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, McCandless, Kevin
- Re: Question: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-01.txt, Otmar Lendl
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), Rosbotham, Paul
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Ray Anderson
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- RE: [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Robert . Shaw
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Clive D.W. Feather
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Ray Anderson
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Clive D.W. Feather
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Otmar Lendl
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), James McEachern
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETFParis), James McEachern
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, James McEachern
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Jul 25 2005
- Re: [Enum] Enum and Bind?, Arnold Ligtvoet
- Re: [Enum] Enum and Bind?, Arnold Ligtvoet
- [Enum] Enum and Bind?, Arnold Ligtvoet
- Re: [Enum] [Fwd: IESG response to appeal regarding draft-ietf-lemonade-mms-mapping-04], lconroy
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- [Enum] Generic Enumservices required?, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] (updated) updated voipeer BOF agenda for IETF 63, David Meyer
- [Enum] updated voipeer BOF agenda for IETF 63, David Meyer
- RE: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Nieminen Klaus
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- [Enum] [Fwd: IESG response to appeal regarding draft-ietf-lemonade-mms-mapping-04], Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Ray Anderson
- [Enum] COMMENTS on draft-ra-shin-enum-mobileweb-01.txt, Ray Anderson
- [Enum] COMMENTS on draft-ra-shin-enum-mobileweb-01.txt, Ray Anderson
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- Jul 23 2005
- Jul 22 2005
- RE: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] VoIP Peering BoF - Naming and Addressing Issues, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- Re: Question: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-01.txt, Andrew Newton
- Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] Required reading for IETF Paris, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] A shameless plug for my new job., Richard Shockey
- Jul 21 2005
- Jul 20 2005
- Jul 19 2005
- Re: Question: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-01.txt, Andrew Newton
- Re: Death to whois! (was Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements), Andrew Newton
- Re: Death to whois! (was Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements), Richard Shockey
- Question: [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-01.txt, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Peter Williams
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Stastny Richard
- [Enum] I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-enum-iris-ereg-01.txt, Internet-Drafts
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, FOUQUART Philippe RD-CORE-ISS
- Re: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Jim Reid
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Thomas Jauch
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Ray Anderson
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Ray Anderson
- Re: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Ray Anderson
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Haberler
- RE: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Michael Haberler
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Michael Haberler
- Jul 18 2005
- Death to whois! (was Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements), Jim Reid
- [Enum] VoIP Peering BoF - Naming and Addressing Issues, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Thomas Jauch
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Ray Anderson
- Re: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Ray Anderson
- Re: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Stastny Richard
- RE: combined User and Carrier ENUM (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: combined User and Carrier ENUM (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Clarification on Carrier ENUM discussions, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Peter Koch
- RE: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Fullbrook Kim \(UK\)
- Re: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Jim Reid
- RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Pfautz, Penn L, NEO
- Re: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Ray Anderson
- Re: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements, Ray Anderson
- RE: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Fullbrook Kim \(UK\)
- RE: [Enum] Comments on ID on new ENUM service "mobileweb", Russell, Nick, VF UK - Technology \(TS\)
- [Enum] Re:, Rich.shockey
- Jul 17 2005
- Jul 16 2005
- Jul 15 2005
- Jul 14 2005
- Jul 13 2005
- Jul 12 2005
- Jul 11 2005
- RE: [Enum] code and maintainence complexity of combined user/carrierENUM proposal, Michael Haberler
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Haberler
- Re: [Enum] code and maintainence complexity of combined user/carrier ENUM proposal, lconroy
- RE: [Enum] code and maintainence complexity of combined user/carrierENUM proposal, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] code and maintainence complexity of combined user/carrier ENUM proposal, Michael Haberler
- RE: combined User and Carrier ENUM (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-lendl-enum-validation-token-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-mayrhofer-enum-validation-arch-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-haberler-carrier-enum-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- [Enum] New I/D concerning ENUM validation architecture submitted, Bernie Hoeneisen
- Re: [Enum] code and maintainence complexity of combined user/carrier ENUM proposal, Jim Reid
- [Enum] code and maintainence complexity of combined user/carrier ENUM proposal, Michael Haberler
- RE: [Enum] Re: Submission of new I-D regarding ENUM on mobile-web, Russell, Nick, VF UK - Technology \(TS\)
- Jul 10 2005
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Haberler
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Rosbotham, Paul
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Rosbotham, Paul
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Rosbotham, Paul
- Re: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Stastny Richard
- Jul 09 2005
- [Enum] Pre or Post Delegation Carrier ENUM, Richard Shockey
- Re: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Stastny Richard
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Haberler
- Re: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Otmar Lendl
- Re: [Enum] Horizontal vs Vertical - not just carriers, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Horizontal vs Vertical, Peter Williams
- RE: [Enum] Horizontal vs Vertical - not just carriers, Ray Anderson
- combined User and Carrier ENUM (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Michael Haberler
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Haberler
- Jul 08 2005
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Horizontal vs Vertical, Stastny Richard
- RE: [Enum] Horizontal vs Vertical, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- [Enum] Nearly Final Agenda items for IETF 63 Paris, Richard Shockey
- [Enum] Horizontal vs Vertical, Stastny Richard
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Richard Shockey
- [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt, Richard Shockey
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Haberler
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Patrik Fältström
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Patrik Fältström
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Jim Reid
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Stastny Richard
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Richard Shockey
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Richard Shockey
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Stastny Richard
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Patrik Fältström
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Patrik Fältström
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- Re: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Stastny Richard
- Re: [Enum] For context around the carrier enum discussion - voip peering BoF in Paris, Richard Shockey
- RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items forIETF Paris), Peter Williams
- Re: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETF Paris), Richard Shockey
- RE: Carrier ENUM Definition (was RE: [Enum] Agenda items for IETFParis), Livingood, Jason
Mail converted by MHonArc