[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Enum] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-hollenbeck-epp-e164-00.txt
That is fine. But my comments do not reflect prejudices. Please do not add
words to my comments.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Reid [mailto:Jim.Reid@nominum.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2001 11:54 AM
To: Kevin McCandless
Cc: 'Judith Oppenheimer'; 'Patrik Faltstrom'; 'Pat Conley'; 'Richard
Shockey'; 'Chip Sharp'; 'Hollenbeck, Scott'; enum@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] FW: I-D ACTION:draft-hollenbeck-epp-e164-00.txt
>>>>> "Kevin" == Kevin McCandless <KMcCandless@illuminet.com> writes:
Kevin> ICANN was developed solely to break up the Network
Kevin> Solutions monopoly = hold on multiple TLDS domains and to
Kevin> add competition in providing the TLDs.
There are many places to debate ICANN and its work. This list is not
one of them. Please take your prejudices about ICANN elsewhere. We
discuss ENUM here and ICANN has no involvement in that at all.
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum