[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Enum] A note from your chairs on the Agenda for IETF 60 including this discussion on Carrier ENUM - Addendum
At
The second hour will then shift to a discussion of Carrier -
Infrastructure ENUM ( what ever you want to call it ) That discussion will
be led by James Seng and Richard Stastny with myself providing continuity
and context to the existing work.
Individuals wishing to make formal ID contributions and or requesting time
to speak on Carrier ENUM discussions are requested to get your ID
documentation in a soon a possible and request time from the mini-BOF chairs.
I should have added to this note that the Carrier ENUM mini-BOF should be
limited to a discussion of :
1. The problem statement. To this end I'm reminded of Steve Lind's succinct
proposal
1a: What are the issues/problems that need to be addressed?
1b: What are the reasons that "Public" ENUM can't solve them?
2. Requirements for a solution without a specific recommendation on what
that technology may or may not be appropriate.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum