Re: FW: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)

[Mike Hammer <mhammer at cisco.com>]

Richard,

Not sure what you sent, but there is spam-checking software that may have 
filtered your message out for some reason (false positive).

Unfortunately a lot does still get through.

Mike


At 10:15 AM 6/22/2004 +0200, Stastny Richard wrote:
> So privacy is already implemented within Cisco ;-)
> It says that I have no right to send messages to this recipient.
> Is the systemadministrator with Cisco also a lawyer?
>
> This would also be a solution for privacy in ENUM:
> You publish numbers but you cannot reach them
> Problem solved
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Systemadministrator
> Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2004 10:06 AM
> To: mhammer at cisco.com
> Subject: Unzustellbar: RE: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs
> Operator ENUM)
>
> Ihre Nachricht hat einige oder alle Empfanger nicht erreicht.
>
>       Betreff:  RE: AW: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs
> Operator  ENUM)
>       Gesendet am:      22.06.2004 10:05
>
> Folgende Empfanger konnten nicht erreicht werden:
>
>       'Mike Hammer' am 22.06.2004 10:06
>             Sie sind nicht berechtigt, Nachrichten an diesen Empfanger
> zu senden. Wenden Sie sich an den Systemadministrator.
>             <mail.oefeg.at #5.7.1 smtp;550 5.7.1 <mhammer at cisco.com>...
> Relaying denied>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum