you wrote. .
> Operators can (and probably should) use a private version of
e164.arpa today. This doesn't need any involvement in the Tier-0 and
Tier-1 stuff or ITU's interim procedures. e164.arpa is the IETF/IAB
agreed domain name for ENUM. It's neutral and not controlled by any
commercial interest or nation. So it's the obvious choice for the
unique and consistent naming scheme that Infrastructure ENUM
needs. There is no viable alternative. [BTW don't confuse the domain
name e164.arpa with its public expression on the internet today.] This
would also make it easier for operators to interwork and perhaps link
their private trees: ie nobody has to figure out the DNS gunk needed
to merge say enum.pulver.com with e164.at or enum.bt.intra.
cdel:--< what specifically do you propose? It sounds like you are proposing
non routable private e164.arpa zones behind firewalls?