[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)

To: "Peter Williams" <home_pw at msn.com>
Subject: Re: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)
From: Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 18:01:02 +0100
Cc: enum at ietf.org, cdel at firsthand.net
In-reply-to: Message from "Peter Williams" <home_pw@msn.com> of "Tue, 29 Jun 2004 09:13:40 PDT." <BAY3-F5tIBc7nQkcHIo0005e17d@hotmail.com>
List-help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: enum-bounces at ietf.org

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Williams <home_pw at msn.com> writes:

    Peter> Jim's idea is use e164.arpa as a name, not as a zone
    Peter> administration point.

EXACTLY!!! Thanks for saying this more clearly than I could! :-)

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

References:
- RE: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)
  - From: Peter Williams

Prev by Date: Re: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)
Next by Date: RE: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)
Previous by thread: RE: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)
Next by thread: RE: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread