RE: ENUM Privacy (was RE: [Enum] User ENUM vs Operator ENUM)

["James McEachern" <jmce at nortelnetworks.com>]

Mike,

 > To maintain parallel choices available in the PSTN, it would be good if
 > the
 > call originator (who might be conceivable paying for the QoS) could
 > choose
 > the long distance "carrier" used to reach the terminating service
 > provider
 > network.  But, I am not entirely sure what that would mean in the context
 > of ITSPs, ISPs, and current non-regulatory frameworks.  

I also am unsure what the concept of a "long distance carrier" would mean in
the context of the end-to-end model, and in a universe where Session Border
Controllers, NAT's B2BUAs and other evils do not exist.

 > I am absolutely
 > sure that making that choice possible so as to avoid the need for any
 > regulation would definitely be good.  I'm just hoping that those seeking
 > business advantage don't invite unintended consequences.
 > 
 > Mike
 > 
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > enum mailing list
 > enum at ietf.org
 > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum