Re: [Enum] IETF, ENUM and NGN

[Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com>]

>>>>> "Richard" == Stastny Richard <Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at> writes:

    >> What matters is the operators agree on a domain name for
    >> Infrastructure ENUM. This might as well be e164.arpa since (a)
    >> it's vendor neutral; (b) already an agreed IETF standard; (c)
    >> not controlled by any nation. It's hard to see how any other
    >> choice of domain name could be better (technically or
    >> politically). And it prevents VoIP/SIP applications from
    >> getting schizophrenia from figuring out which domain name they
    >> should use based on what network they're running in today.

    Richard> This is easy, as I already stated and many SER
    Richard> and Asterisk based SIP server already query more then one
    Richard> tree now. Its one line of code.

That must be a very long line of code if it can query multiple domain
names, prioritise the order they're used, arbitrate between conflicting
answers and do all of the other policy stuff that's needed.


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum