[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Enum] IETF, ENUM and NGN
At 10:00 AM 7/10/2004, James Seng wrote:
I been watching this discussion with a little bit of interest. Seem like
there is a disagreement but really, it is just a unsync discussion, where
one is talking about User ENUM and another Infrastructure/Carrier ENUM.
This is why we should probably get at least the definition nails down
before the next IETF so we can have a more productive mini-BoF on
infrastructure carrier ENUM. (User ENUM issues as I understand will be
discussed in the session before).
Speaking of the mini-BoF, for those who has interest to speak, please send
an email to Richard Stastny and myself. Ideally, you should already have
an I-D. Please do so by next week so we can arrange the agenda.
Thank you .. let me second James's note here to the entire list.
We are also looking for a volunteer for scribes (two preferably).
ps: So far on the agenda, we have something from Patrick/Richard giving
problem statement,
Very quick statement ..
Stastny will give a background and Penn/Steve already indicated they have
something to contribute.
-James Seng
Mike Hammer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Senior Manager, Strategic Technology Initiatives
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141 at fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile: +1 703.593.2683, Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum