RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt

["Michael Hammer \(mhammer\)" <mhammer at cisco.com>]

Ray,

Although voice is a first killer app, it is not the last, so I
understand the "non-voice" part of your comment.  Could you elaborate on
the "non-IP" part?

Mike 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ray Anderson [mailto:ray at bango.net] 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:22 AM
> To: Michael Hammer (mhammer); Livingood, Jason; Richard Shockey
> Cc: enum at ietf.org; Stastny Richard
> Subject: RE: [Enum] Fwd: I-D 
> ACTION:draft-livingood-shockey-enum-npd-00.txt
> 
> At 01:22 26/07/2005, Michael Hammer \(mhammer\) wrote:
> >Agree completely.  I think I hinted at the idea that the 
> E.164 number 
> >could terminate in either the IP domain or TDM domain and still be 
> >included in ENUM.
> 
> Just for clarity, there will be ENUM's (E.164 numbers) that 
> DO NOT terminate in either IP or TDM domains.  They are used 
> purely for "non-voice" purposes, and allocated by an E.164 
> "delegator" for such purposes. 
> 

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum