RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements

["Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz at att.com>]

I'd expect so although there might some argument about records with the
same service but different preference levels. 

-----Original Message-----
From: James McEachern [mailto:jmce at nortel.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 6:35 PM
To: Pfautz, Penn L, NEO; Stastny Richard
Cc: enum at ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Enum] E.164 communication assumptions/requirements

Penn, 
Does this extend to the Carrier being able to decide what to use when
the User ENUM query returns several records?

Jim

 > -----Original Message-----
 > From: Pfautz, Penn L, NEO [mailto:ppfautz at att.com]
 > 
 > Richard,
 > I think the carrier can make that decision in the absence of some
other
 > restriction.
 > 


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum