[Enum] Re: [Geopriv] Re: [Simple] tel URIs in common policy

["James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>]

At 06:14 PM 8/17/2005 +0200, Stastny Richard wrote:
> I fully agree that there seems to be an issue here,
> because the problem is currently discussed at voipeer
> also.The format sip:+1-232-555-1234 at foo.com;user=phone
> gets very important especially for Carrier ENUM indicating
> the destination providers (see below)

So, and perhaps this is a naive point/question - what happens when a 
carrier no longer operates a phone number that is in operation by another 
carrier?

For example, my wife has had the same cell phone number for 15+ years, yet 
she has recently changed to her third carrier.  The company that originally 
owned her phone number is being acquired by a 4th company now (here in the 
US, giving you a hint as to two of the players involved).

What does this do to your statement:

        "The format sip:+1-232-555-1234 at foo.com;user=phone
gets very important especially for Carrier ENUM indicating
the destination providers"

> It also concerns the CLI and CLIR aspect not yet fully discussed
> in voipeer. This is one issue definitely in scope of voipeer.
>
> comments inline


cheers,
James

                                *******************
                Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented.

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum