Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY

[Bernie Hoeneisen <bhoeneis at switch.ch>]

You could also check from the Jabber-log, and there are only 3 options.
(I personally typed them in during the session... ;-) )

cheers,
 Bernie


On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Richard Shockey wrote:

> Stastny Richard wrote:
>
>  IMHO there is a minor inconsistency here:
>
>
>
>  A.	Pfautz approach of use of non-terminal NAPTR's 
> B.	Harbler approach with delegation at RIPE/ITU  aka [CC]. c.e164.arpa 
> C.	Harbler approach with delegation after RIPE/ITU c. [CC].e164.arpa 
> D.	Using a different (non-e164.arpa) domain 
>
>
>
>  Hum indicates strong preference for B. [CC]. c.e164.arpa delegation of carrier tree at RIPE/ITU.
>
>
>  There where only three options for hum
> B and C where one option, the choice between the two was for further discussion
>
>
>
> HUMMM ... I distinctly remember offering it up as 4 options ..but my
> brain cells have not been firing properly of late.
>
> Can anyone else comment here?  I certainly could be mistaken.
>
>  BTW, it is Haberler
>
>
> of course .. sorry ..
>
>  -richard
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>
>
>
>
>
>  -- 
>
>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
> NeuStar Inc.
> 46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
> sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com
> ENUM +87810-13313-31331
> PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683
> Fax: +1 815.333.1237
> <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or 
> <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum