[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY

Stastny Richard wrote:

There is only a doubt about the minutes

It must be possible to correct minutes without having a poll on the list

-richard
PS: it was a nonbinding hum anyway (should also be mentioned in the minutes)
for the avoidance of doubt


yes ..it was a "straw poll" and as such non binding.

I will reflect this in the minutes.

________________________________

Von: Michael Hammer (mhammer) [mailto:mhammer at cisco.com]
Gesendet: Fr 19.08.2005 23:06
An: Richard Shockey; Stastny Richard
Cc: enum at ietf.org
Betreff: RE: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY


Umm... I wasn't there, but have a question. 

Which holds more weight, a hum at the f2f meeting or the email list?

If there is doubt about a decision, shouldn't that be put to the list in any case?

Why not just poll the list now?

Mike



________________________________

From: enum-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:enum-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Richard Shockey
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 3:18 PM
To: Stastny Richard
Cc: enum at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Meeting Minutes IETF 63 Paris - PRELIMINARY


Stastny Richard wrote:

IMHO there is a minor inconsistency here:
A. Pfautz approach of use of non-terminal NAPTR's B. Harbler approach with delegation at RIPE/ITU aka [CC]. c.e164.arpa C. Harbler approach with delegation after RIPE/ITU c. [CC].e164.arpa D. Using a different (non-e164.arpa) domain


Hum indicates strong preference for B. [CC]. c.e164.arpa delegation of carrier tree at RIPE/ITU.


There where only three options for hum
B and C where one option, the choice between the two was for further discussion



	HUMMM ... I distinctly remember offering it up as 4 options ..but my brain cells have not been firing properly of late.
	
	Can anyone else comment here?  I certainly could be mistaken.

BTW, it is Haberler


	of course .. sorry ..

-richard



_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum





--

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683
Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<






--



Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683
Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum