RE: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM

["Nieminen Klaus" <Klaus.Nieminen at ficora.fi>]

In most CEPT countries MNP is implemented using centralised NP
databases. These are typically managed by a consortia of network
operators, so NRAs may not have any information about ported numbers.
Well, I think that this fact is not very important.

At least also Malta and Cyprus has distributed MNP databases, but does
this mean that the validation information is not available or is it
possible to gather the required data from multiple databases maintained
by different operators?

regards,

- Klaus -

-----Original Message-----
From: enum-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:enum-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Otmar Lendl
Sent: 11. lokakuuta 2005 16:41
To: enum at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM


On 2005/10/11 15:10, "Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz at att.com> wrote:
>
>                                            Maybe some of those whose 
> countries use "onward routing" etc. can confirm whether there is any 
> centralized database outside of the network detailing those 
> arrangements.

Austria uses onward routing for fixed line NP. There is no centralized
DB which shows which number has been ported to whom.

The NRA only keeps tabs on what number have been ported, but this DB
does not include the information necessary to route calls.

/ol
--
< Otmar Lendl (lendl at nic.at) | nic.at Systems Engineer >

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum