Re: [Enum] A proposal for Carrier ENUM

[Richard Shockey <richard at shockey.us>]

Otmar Lendl wrote:

On 2005/10/11 16:10, "Pfautz, Penn L, NEO" <ppfautz at att.com> wrote:
  

Otmar:
Thanks. As long as the ported-to carrier is indicated in the NRA
database that is enough for determining the carrier of record for
carrier ENUM.
    

>From what I've heard from our NRA, they just use a flag "This number
has been ported", but they do not keep track on where the number
was ported to.

So they have no idea who the carrier of record is for ported numbers.

(Don't ask me why they do it this way. I don't get it, too.)
  

Ask the incumbent Austrian Carrier. :-)   I know why they want it that way ...there isnt an incumbent carrier on the face of planet Earth that likes Number Portability and none of them wants to make it easier to implement or maintain.

/ol
  

-- 


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff
NeuStar Inc.
46000 Center Oak Plaza  -   Sterling, VA  20166
sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org   sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com
ENUM +87810-13313-31331
PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683
Fax: +1 815.333.1237
<mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or 
<mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz>
<http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org>
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum