On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 01:23:40AM +0200, Stastny Richard wrote: > Congatulations, the charter seems quite well done on first reading Hey, thanks! > first questions and remarks: > > 1. The goals and milestones seem to be a bit out-of-order and confusing > > 2. -Jan 07 Submit I-D on the use of DNS SRV and NAPTR > -Jan 07 Submit document to IESG on the use of DNS SRV and NAPTR > records as specified by RFC 3263 (BCP) > > What is the reason for this I-D and what in addition to RFC 3263 > should be stated? (i). The dates are clearly botched, thanks for pointing that out. I'll just mention that I'm expecting that we'll hammer out some realistic dates for the work-plan I've described. I put up what I believe is a pretty agressive (and possibly unrealistic), and I'm planning for us to have that discussion in Vancouver. (ii). Regarding RFC 3263, several folks asked for a document that outlines the *deployment issues* (and perhaps BCPs) with 3263. I'll fix (i). above. Does (ii). clarify the situation? Thanks for the comments. Dave
Attachment:
pgpnG0yK5oUq9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ enum mailing list enum at ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum