Re: [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on Infrastructure ENUM Requirements

To: <ppfautz at att.com>
Subject: Re: [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on Infrastructure ENUM Requirements
From: Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski at verisign.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:46:10 +0100
Cc: enum at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <34DA635B184A644DA4588E260EC0A25A0CA3FB49@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd .att.com>
List-help: <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: Enum Discussion List <enum.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:enum@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum>, <mailto:enum-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4425AD81.1090805@shockey.us> <34DA635B184A644DA4588E260EC0A25A0CA3FB49@ACCLUST02EVS1.ugd.att.com>

Hi Penn

Interesting document.  Are you filing a petition
for rulemaking for change to the 47 CFR Part 52 to
implement it?

--tony


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on Infrastructure ENUM Requirements
  - From: Klaus Darilion

References:
- [Enum] ENUM Working Group Last call on Infrastructure ENUM Requirements
  - From: Richard Shockey
- [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on Infrastructure ENUM Requirements
  - From: Pfautz, Penn L, NEO