[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on InfrastructureENUMRequirements



I had no idea what that was either.  ;-)

Google found it, like nearly all else:

Code of Federal Regulations, Title 47 Telecommunication 

http://www.washingtonwatchdog.org/documents/cfr/title47/part52.html 

So, what does this have to do with changes to this FCC regulatory
document??

Jason

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stastny Richard [mailto:Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at] 
> Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 3:14 PM
> To: Tony Rutkowski; ppfautz at att.com
> Cc: enum at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on 
> InfrastructureENUMRequirements
> 
> Tony,
>  
> if you post such cryptic numbers and letters (47 CFR Part 52) 
> on this list, coild you please be more specific
>  
> You should also consider that the IETF is a global standards 
> body and that there are some 200+ other countries out there
>  
> Richard
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: Tony Rutkowski [mailto:trutkowski at verisign.com]
> Gesendet: Mo 24.04.2006 20:46
> An: ppfautz at att.com
> Cc: enum at ietf.org
> Betreff: Re: [Enum] RE: ENUM Working Group Last call on 
> InfrastructureENUM Requirements
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Penn
> 
> Interesting document.  Are you filing a petition for 
> rulemaking for change to the 47 CFR Part 52 to implement it?
> 
> --tony
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> enum at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
> 

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum