RE: [Enum] How to correctly set up the request URI?

["Richard Shockey" <richard at shockey.us>]

This discussion is best kept in SPEERMINT. IMHO.

s/

your bewildered ENUM WG co-chair

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Stastny Richard [mailto:Richard.Stastny at oefeg.at]
> > Sent: Friday, June 02, 2006 15:41
> > To: Creighton, Tom; speermint at ietf.org
> > Cc: enum at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Enum] How to correctly set up the request URI?
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > being in favor of the usage of an AoR in Infrastructure ENUM, I have
> no
> > problems with your proposed words. There are only two issues:
> >
> > 1. There will be some people objecting, I assume.
> 
> [Tom Creighton wrote:]
> 
> I welcome any comments or recommendations that anyone has to help move
> beyond this discussion.
> 
> > 2. Where should this words go?
> > -in the ENUM requirements or in the SPEERMINT requirements?
> 
> [Tom Creighton wrote:]
> 
> My initial reaction would be to keep it in SPEERMINT as this is a
> peering architecture issue and not a specific ENUM protocol issue, but
> as you said, advice from the 4 chairs would be appreciated.


_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
enum at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum